×
  • Home
  • About
    • Firm Overview
    • Experience
    • Fraternal Law Conference
    • Conference Sponsorship
  • Our Attorneys
    • Overview
    • Timothy M. Burke
    • Sean P. Callan
    • John E. Christopher
    • Amy M. Hebbeler
    • Patrick K. Hogan
    • Micah E. Kamrass
    • Ilana L. Linder
    • Jacklyn D. Olinger
    • Jacob W. Purcell
    • Jeffrey C. Sun
  • Practice Areas
    • Overview
    • Real Estate and Housing
    • Tax
    • Employment Issues
    • Corporate Governance
    • Grant-Making
    • Litigation
    • Risk Management & Hazing
    • Fundraising & Stewardship
    • State Registration for Greek Foundations
  • Client Resources
  • Anti-Hazing
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
    • Join Our Newsletter
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Instagram
  • Newsletter

The health and safety of our employees, customers and communities are our top priority. Read about our response to COVID-19.

  • Home
  • About
    • Firm Overview
    • Experience
    • Fraternal Law Conference
    • Conference Sponsorship
  • Our Attorneys
    • Overview
    • Timothy M. Burke
    • Sean P. Callan
    • John E. Christopher
    • Amy M. Hebbeler
    • Patrick K. Hogan
    • Micah E. Kamrass
    • Ilana L. Linder
    • Jacklyn D. Olinger
    • Jacob W. Purcell
    • Jeffrey C. Sun
  • Practice Areas
    • Overview
    • Real Estate and Housing
    • Tax
    • Employment Issues
    • Corporate Governance
    • Grant-Making
    • Litigation
    • Risk Management & Hazing
    • Fundraising & Stewardship
    • State Registration for Greek Foundations
  • Client Resources
  • Anti-Hazing
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
    • Join Our Newsletter
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Instagram
513-721-5525
Fraternal Law

Fraternal Law Newsletter

Publications

Newsletter


Articles

  • New Hampshire Law Infringes on Voting Rights
  • Update: Court Agrees with DOJ, Rules Against the University of Iowa
  • Update: Harvard Files Answers to Lawsuits
  • Lawsuit Filed Against Yale is An Attack on Greek Organizations
  • Timothy Piazza Anti-Hazing Law Passed in Pennsylvania
  • Navigating Louisiana's Max Gruver Act
  • Bloomington Ordinance Found Unconstitutional

Search

Newsletter > March 2019 > "Update: Court Agrees with DOJ, Rules Against the University of Iowa"

Update: Court Agrees with DOJ, Rules Against the University of Iowa

Ilana Linder, Manley Burke LPA, ilana.linder@manleyburke.com


In the January 2019 Newsletter, the Department of Justice’s (DOJ) intervention in a case against the University of Iowa was high- lighted. Specifically, the DOJ took the position that the University had engaged in impermissible viewpoint discrimination when it cherry–picked which student groups’ beliefs it wished to allow and which it sought to condemn. Last month, the District Court agreed with the DOJ, ruling in favor of the student group Business Leaders in Christ and granting a permanent injunction to prevent the University from rejecting or otherwise denying the group university recognition based on the University of Iowa’s “human rights policy.”

Business Leaders in Christ claimed that its constitutional rights of free speech and religious freedom were infringed upon when its university recognition was revoked because it refused to strike a faith statement to which all group members were required to sub- scribe.

The court did not take issue with the human rights policy on its face. Rather, it concluded that the University engaged in unlawful viewpoint discrimination because of the manner in which the policy was applied unevenly to various student groups. The court found highly problematic the fact that other groups—including the Chinese Students and Scholars Association that limits member- ship to Chinese students, along with the campus chapter of the National Lawyers Guild that excludes students with certain political viewpoints—were not similarly punished by the University.

Since the University did not apply consistent standards to all groups, strict scrutiny applied. Accordingly, despite acknowledging the University’s interests in developing student leadership, providing a quality campus environment, promoting diversity, and ensuring that all students be granted equal access to educational opportunities, the court concluded that it had not narrowly tailored its means of accomplishing these interests. As such, the group was entitled to the permanent injunction and reinstatement of its University recognition.

JOIN OUR NEWSLETTER

Attorney Advertising. The laws governing legal advertising in the state of Ohio require the following statement in any publication of this kind: "THIS IS AN ADVERTISEMENT." This website is designed for general information only. The information presented at this site should not be construed to be formal legal advice nor the formation of a lawyer/client relationship.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Copyright © 2023 Fraternal Law Partners. All rights reserved.

Privacy Policy Disclaimer
Fraternal Law

Newsletters

Sign Up For Updates

Get the latest news from Fraternal Law Partners in your inbox.

    By submitting this form, you are consenting to receive marketing emails from: Fraternal Law Parnterns. You can revoke your consent to recieve emails at any time by using the SafeUnsubscribe® Link, found at the bottom of every email. Emails are serviced by Constant Contact.