Publications
Newsletter
Articles
- JUDGE DISMISSES BERKELEY ZONING CASE
- PURDUE WITHDRAWS RECOGNITION OF FRATERNITY
- SEARCH HELD UNREASONABLE
- INJURED FORMER PLEDGE SUES PHI GAMMA DELTA
- UPDATE ON CLS V. MARTINEZ
- SOCIAL MEDIA ALERT – FACEBOOK USED AGAINST RUSH CANDIDATES
- ARKANSAS DEMANDS INDEMNIFICATION
- STUDENT KILLED IN ACCIDENTAL SHOOTING AT FLORIDA STATE FRATERNITY
- DORMANT CHAPTER HOUSES
Search
Newsletter > January 2011 > "SOCIAL MEDIA ALERT – FACEBOOK USED AGAINST RUSH CANDIDATES"
SOCIAL MEDIA ALERT – FACEBOOK USED AGAINST RUSH CANDIDATES
Craig Moore, Armstrong Teasdale LLP (co-chair, Social Media practice group), cmoore@armstrongteasedale.com
In the ever growing age of social media, the challenges faced by fraternal organizations are not always as apparent as one might think. Recently, MSNBC reported (http://on.msnbc.com/fiqs2y) that numerous sororities in the south have been hit by a rash of what can most accurately be called cyber stalking. In these incidents, an individual passing as a sorority member by using a fake Facebook account complete with photos and names of current sorority members, contacts pledges and begins to inquire about the pledges’ background under the guise of rush related activities. These questions begin innocently enough, and continue via Facebook over a period of days or weeks until the imposter begins to request more personal information and photographs. Ultimately these requests turn to an explicit nature, in which the pledge is asked to pose in various states of undress. If a pledge protests, the imposter continues to push, suggesting that failure to comply with the requests will result in the pledge’s disqualification from the rush process. Scared of losing out on the chance to be part of the sorority, numerous pledges have relented to the requests and have been taken advantage of by this reprehensible activity. Once initial embarrassing information or photographs are provided, the imposter, begins to blackmail the subjects seeking even more explicit material with threats of publishing the information to the pledge’s friends and family.
While all can agree that this type of activity is abhorrent and one that no fraternal organization would ever knowingly allow to occur, there are ways that you can help ensure that your chapters are not victims. By instituting an official social media policy you provide your chapters with an important tool in fighting these attacks and also gain an opportunity to avoid legal exposure in a wide range of areas. A comprehensive social media policy can dictate who may speak on behalf of your organization and provide pledges with a reference point if conduct ever becomes a concern. You may also wish to set forth whether rush related activities may occur via social media at all, and if so, provides a description of those activities, and designate certain identified individuals who are authorized to conduct rush activities. By providing this policy to pledges and current members, you give each of your chapters an important tool to protect their members. Additional guidance as to the nature of content and the ramifications of sharing private content on public social media pages can also be very valuable.
Providing training at the beginning of each semester provides an additional level of protection that serves to reinforce your policy and protect your members. Not only can policies and training help members avoid attacks such as those referenced above, they also can provide an important front line in limiting your organizations overall exposure to litigation. If your organization does not currently have a Social Media policy, now is the time to consider implementing one. Counsel experienced in the area can provide you with ideas on how to protect your chapters and provide valuable information to your members.