×
  • Home
  • About
    • Firm Overview
    • Experience
    • Fraternal Law Conference
    • Conference Sponsorship
  • Our Attorneys
    • Overview
    • Timothy M. Burke
    • Sean P. Callan
    • John E. Christopher
    • Amy M. Hebbeler
    • Patrick K. Hogan
    • Micah E. Kamrass
    • Ilana L. Linder
    • Jacklyn D. Olinger
    • Jacob W. Purcell
    • Jeffrey C. Sun
  • Practice Areas
    • Overview
    • Real Estate and Housing
    • Tax
    • Employment Issues
    • Corporate Governance
    • Grant-Making
    • Litigation
    • Risk Management & Hazing
    • Fundraising & Stewardship
    • State Registration for Greek Foundations
  • Client Resources
  • Anti-Hazing
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
    • Join Our Newsletter
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Instagram
  • Newsletter

The health and safety of our employees, customers and communities are our top priority. Read about our response to COVID-19.

  • Home
  • About
    • Firm Overview
    • Experience
    • Fraternal Law Conference
    • Conference Sponsorship
  • Our Attorneys
    • Overview
    • Timothy M. Burke
    • Sean P. Callan
    • John E. Christopher
    • Amy M. Hebbeler
    • Patrick K. Hogan
    • Micah E. Kamrass
    • Ilana L. Linder
    • Jacklyn D. Olinger
    • Jacob W. Purcell
    • Jeffrey C. Sun
  • Practice Areas
    • Overview
    • Real Estate and Housing
    • Tax
    • Employment Issues
    • Corporate Governance
    • Grant-Making
    • Litigation
    • Risk Management & Hazing
    • Fundraising & Stewardship
    • State Registration for Greek Foundations
  • Client Resources
  • Anti-Hazing
  • Contact
    • Contact Us
    • Join Our Newsletter
    • Facebook
    • Twitter
    • Instagram
513-721-5525
Fraternal Law

Fraternal Law Newsletter

Publications

Newsletter


Articles

  • HOUSE CORPORATION HEROES
  • BLACK FACE CONTROVERSY REDUX
  • 44 INDIVIDUALS SUED IN DEATH OF PLEDGE
  • NEVADA DROWNING LEADS TO HAZING CHARGES
  • FIRST AMENDMENT PERMITS MUSLIMS TO EXCLUDE WOMEN
  • MIT -- THE FRATERNITY SETTLEMENT EMPHASIZES EDUCATION AND PREVENTION
  • NEW IRS PUBLICATION ON FRATERNITY FOUNDATION GRANTS
  • RELATIONSHIP STATEMENTS ARKANSAS STYLE -- NO WOMEN NEEDED
  • COUNTERPOINT: RELATIONSHIP STATEMENTS AS AN EFFORT TO USURP CONTROL

Search

Newsletter > January 2003 > "FIRST AMENDMENT PERMITS MUSLIMS TO EXCLUDE WOMEN"

FIRST AMENDMENT PERMITS MUSLIMS TO EXCLUDE WOMEN

Timothy M. Burke, Manley Burke, tburke@manleyburke.com


The Nation of Islam held a “Men’s Meeting on Black on Black Crime, Violence and Drugs in Communities of Color” in the City of Boston-owned McCormick Center. Louis Farrakhan was the principal speaker. Women were barred from attending. One of the women prohibited from attending the meeting filed a complaint with the Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination. The complainant argued that the McCormick Center was a place of public accommodation and women could not legally be excluded.

The Massachusetts Supreme Court disagreed.1  The court noted that the separation of sexes is part of the belief system of the Nation of Islam’s religious practices. Relying on two previous U.S. Supreme Court cases,2 the Massachusetts Court recognized that “intrusion into the internal structure or affairs of an association is one way in which government action may unconstitutionally burden this freedom.” According to the Court “if the forced inclusion of an unwanted person affects in a significant way the group’s ability to advocate  public or private viewpoints,  it is in violation of the First Amendment.” The Court recognized that “to be afforded First Amendment protection, there is no requirement that an association exists for the particular purpose of disseminating a specific message … it must merely engage in expressive activity that would be impaired by the unwanted inclusion.”

There are contrary cases, as the court noted. For example, the Massachusetts Supreme Court had previously ruled that a rod and gun club must admit female members because its policy of admitting any man over the age of 21 indicated a “total absence of genuine selectivity in membership”  and that, therefore, the “purportedly private club was, in fact, a place of public accommodation.” 3

As has been discussed in previous issues of Fraternal Law (January 2001 for example), fraternities may avail themselves of protection of the First Amendment, at least at public institutions, under both the theory that they are intimate associations and that they are expressive associations. The Massachusetts Supreme Court found that the Nation of Islam was an expressive association and, therefore, had little apparent difficulty in finding that it could exclude females from a male-only meeting.

1 Donaldson v. Farrakhan, 436 Mass. 94, 762 N.E.2d 835 (2002)

2 Boy Scouts of America v. Dale, 530 U.S 640 (2000) and Roberts v. United States Jaycees, 468 lJ S 609 (1984)

3 Concord Rod & Gun Club, Inc. v. Massachusetts Commission Against Discrimination, 402 Mass. 716 (1988)

JOIN OUR NEWSLETTER

Attorney Advertising. The laws governing legal advertising in the state of Ohio require the following statement in any publication of this kind: "THIS IS AN ADVERTISEMENT." This website is designed for general information only. The information presented at this site should not be construed to be formal legal advice nor the formation of a lawyer/client relationship.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Copyright © 2023 Fraternal Law Partners. All rights reserved.

Privacy Policy Disclaimer
Fraternal Law

Newsletters

Sign Up For Updates

Get the latest news from Fraternal Law Partners in your inbox.

    By submitting this form, you are consenting to receive marketing emails from: Fraternal Law Parnterns. You can revoke your consent to recieve emails at any time by using the SafeUnsubscribe® Link, found at the bottom of every email. Emails are serviced by Constant Contact.